Type Here to Get Search Results !

Writ To Remove Assin North MP: Quayson Seeks Review


The particular National Democratic Our elected representatives (NDC) Member associated with Parliament (MP) with regard to Assin North, Wayne Gyakye Quayson, offers filed an overview software challenging your decision associated with the Supreme Courtroom to hear the case wanting to quit him from keeping himself like a legislator. On March eight, this year, the seven-member panel from the court held that will Mr Quayson have been duly served via substituted service using the writ and the particular injunction application.

Appropriately, the court adjourned the situation to Wed (March 16, 2022) for hearing, plus ordered the MEGA-PIXEL arranging his declaration of case, reacting to the courtroom processes by the other day. When the situation was called, the particular MP was lacking, but his advice, Tsatsu Tsikata, knowledgeable the court that will his client experienced filed a evaluation challenging the court’s decision that the particular substituted service has been rightly served plus, therefore, the situation has been to be noticed. Counsel also stated his client experienced also filed a software for stay associated with proceedings for the particular case to become put on keep until the last determination for the particular review.


The resident of Assin Breku, Michael Ankomah-Nimfah, who secured the judgment from your Shawl Coast High Courtroom nullifying Mr Quayson’s election around the foundation that he kept a Canadian nationality, wants an injunction from the Best Court, restraining your pet from holding themselves out as a good MP. The individual argues that in spite of the judgment with the Cape Coast Substantial Court, Mr Quayson continues to march himself as the sitting MP.

This individual is also looking for an interpretation associated with Article 94(2) (a) of the 1992 Constitution, which pubs an individual owing fidelity overseas from contesting being an MP, the particular same constitutional supply the High Courtroom used to nullify the MP’s political election.


It arrived up that the particular review as well as the remain of proceedings programs were filed simply by the attorneys with regard to Mr Quayson the other day. That led the particular court to question why counsel do not act timeously but waited plus filed the procedures yesterday once the courtroom had delivered the ruling on 03 8. Mr Tsiakata answered which he used for the procedures and the choice from the court final Monday, but obtained them last Wednesday. The court, consequently, the Registrar associated with the Court, Matt Antiaye, who verified what Mr Tsikata said.

Counsel with regard to the plaintiff, Honest Davies, submitted that this review and the particular stay of procedures application should not really bar the courtroom from going forward to hear the particular injunction application. The particular Attorney –General (A-G), Godfred Yeboah Déesse, who is in addition a defendant inside the case, on the sides with Mr Revealed and urged typically the court to notice the injunction app.


Inspite of their reservations in regards to the time of the apps, the court chosen to adjourn the circumstance to March 30 if the review app can be heard. Typically the presiding judge, Rights Jones Dotse, mentioned on March 30, some other panel would likely hear the overview application, and structured on the effects of the overview, the court would likely hear the app for stay regarding proceedings, and in addition according to the outcome, typically the court could notice the injunction app.

Immediately Justice Dotse finished, Mr Tsikata rose to the feet and published that Justice Dotse had prejudiced typically the review application by simply suggesting that injunction application would always be heard. This seemed to be refuted by Rights Dotse, who was adament that he mentioned the injunction app could be read according to the final result of the overview.


Post a Comment

* Please Don't Spam Here. All the Comments are Reviewed by Admin.